CHANDRA PRATAP SINGH V/S STATE OF MP (2023)

Distinction between common intention and common object was made by the court in the case.
Distinction between common intention and common object was made by the court in the case.
couple, gay couple, pride month-5385141.jpg

Distinction made out between common intention u/s 34 IPC and common object u/s 149 IPC.

  1. Common intention u/s 34 IPC implies a prearranged plan with a prior meeting of the minds among individuals, indicating a shared intent to commit a crime together.
  2. In contrast, common object u/s 149 IPC does not demand a prior meeting of minds; it focuses on a group of individuals pursuing a common unlawful objective without a prearranged plan.
Share:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *